Seduction of the Innocent, redux
Superheroes bad for growing minds and bodies
From sciencedaily.com, published August 15, 2010:
"There is a big difference in the movie superhero of today and the comic book superhero of yesterday," said psychologist Sharon Lamb, PhD, distinguished professor of mental health at University of Massachusetts-Boston. "Today's superhero is too much like an action hero who participates in non-stop violence; he's aggressive, sarcastic and rarely speaks to the virtue of doing good for humanity."
Some of this may be right, but it surely misunderstands the foundations of the superhero comics of past and present. Any simple reading of the first Superman, Batman, et al., comic books extol quite a bit of the very things being condemned presently by Sharon Lamb.
"Researcher Carlos Santos, PhD, of Arizona State University, examined 426 middle school boys' ability to resist being emotionally stoic, autonomous and physically tough -- stereotyped images of masculinity -- in their relationships. He also looked at how this would affect their psychological adjustment."
I suspect a lot of the psychological gnashing of teeth about superheroes is manufactured by targeting certain cultural images that possess popularity (and bankability), and then working backwards from that as a tool to explain male behavior. The link seems arbitrary and based more upon the high profile of a popular image.
But, accepting the link as real, by simply revising the keywords used as negative characteristics by these researchers changes the actual value basis for superheroes (as defined by the psychological experts in this article, what bonafides they possess beyond doing polling is not explained). To whit: "emotionally stoic" is probably a positive obverse compared to whining; "autonomous" can be self-sufficiency versus "clingy" chronic co-dependency; and "physically tough" surely beats out "physically abused," that is, if victimhood can be defined as a negative (and in modern culture, that's debatable).
But clearly my list of alternatives is as knee-jerk as these researchers. Defining male behavior through the hyper-relief cartoon textures of superhero comics is a dead-end, because the superhero books, whether they exactly resemble the descriptions of these researchers, or are radically different, is still simply not normal behavior in the real world.
My question is this: If superheroes influence the creation of the negatives the psychologists have in their grocery list, why don't the armies of comic book store customers possess those characteristics? Even a nominal study of the fanbase of superhero comics would show the typical "normal" activities dominate whether as comic aficionados or not, let alone the pro-active energy typical in a comic book superhero.
Perhaps researchers should be seizing upon why males might hold freely to an ideal as defined by that group of cultural emblems, versus succumbing in passive coercion from those emblems.
But their main target is the superhero movie, easy to condemn for violence which seems to be always considered a wrong. The rest of the article seemed to also contain a simple attack upon paternalism, which makes sense since fatherhood is deeply aligned with superhero themes, where a missing father accounts for any number of heroes who embark upon serial missions of help/rescue/revenge.
Psychiatry of this sort is seeking to tinker with the mechanics of 'manliness,' and I think these attitudes presented by these psychologists suggests an inability to see beyond the fun-house mirror distortions of the basic American superhero comic. They should first possess more insight than what they pitifully have got (as reported in this article) if they're going to suggest reforms for a population of superhero-loving males.
ADVERTISEMENT: You will see Amazon links on this web site because I am an Amazon affiliate. If you buy something rom them they might throw me a few coins and then I'll buy a comic book.
Related: More Reviews!
Review: Jew Gangster by Joe Kubert
Review: Harley Quinn vs Zatanna #1 – Fighting in a void
Review: Conan the Barbarian #186 – Conan and a water nymph cooperate on a jailbreak
Batman Family #1, Sept-October 1975 – Batgirl and Robin battle a resurrected Benedict Arnold out to spoil the Bicentennial
Detective Comics #831 - Reforming Harley Quinn June 2007
Brave and the Bold #131, DC Comics December 1976 by Bob Haney with art by Jim Aparo
Review Adventure Comics #423, featuring Supergirl DC Comics Sept 1972
Review: Knight Terrors First Blood #1 DC Comics July 2023
Hell is a Squared Circle by Chris Condon and Francesco Biagini September 2022 AfterShock Comics
Review: Weird Mystery #4, Jan-Feb 1973
The Secret Life of Catwoman, Batman #62, Dec 1950–Jan 1951
The Origin of the Superman-Batman Team - review of World's Finest #94, May-June 1958, art by Dick Sprang
The Spirit Reborn - Review of The Spirit #1, Feb 2007 By Darwyn Cooke
Superman Confidential #1, January 2007 By Darwyn Cooke and Tim Sale
Richard Corben's Edgar Allan Poe – Poe's Haunt of Horror #1, 2006
Bloodstar - 1975 - Richard Corben
House on the Borderland 2000 - by Richard Corben
Review of the Joker Graphic Novel - Brian Azzarello and Lee Bermejo 2003
Review Harley Quinn #55, Feb 2019 - "We'll All Be Home for Christmas"
Edgar Allen Poe Haunt of Horror #1 2006 - by Richard Corben
You will see Amazon links on this web site because I am an Amazon affiliate. I earn from qualifying purchases.
Original Page September 2010 | Updated May 1, 2026