Zack Snyder's Justice League
Film Review: Zack Snyder's Justice League, directed by Zack Snyder
Film Fan: Cyborg was barely in the Joss Whedon version of Justice League, but in Zack Snyder's version, he's integral, he's very important.
The Duck One: Zack Snyder has four hours to show us why Whedon's version is a pile of cheese, and that his version is a grand opera of superhero world dynamics, and for the most part, he does it.
Film Fan: The Whedon version does move faster, and does have funnier jokes.
The Duck One: I dispute the "funnier" part, but yes it certainly has more attempts at getting the audience to hee-haw more often.
Film Fan: I see the articles by people who've already seen it. By mixing together the underlying tone of these review pieces plus having seen the trailer, I understand and feel it's going to be a great film.
The Duck One: How do you know they've seen it?
Film Fan: How else can they review it!
The Duck One: There's a lot of money sloshing around the internet so that "influencers" can say something is great, or terrible, or whatever. The corporations are waging war on each other and on the good taste, if there is such a thing, in the marketplace, by paying off the mercenaries in the digital world to back up their corporate projects or to tear down the projects of their enemies.
Film Fan: You make it sound like there's a tightly organized group on the internet making things happen, getting things said!
The Duck One: No. But that's why these people with mass groups of followers get paid to promote something. They're influencers because they influence.
Film Fan: So, James Gunn, the director of the new Suicide Squad, is paying people off to throw plaudits at his film?
The Duck One: No. The production company spends money getting the influencers to spread the news about the greatness of their film. It's just part of their marketing. It's not a conspiracy, it's a way to promote it through a pre-packaged emotional response to a product, by paying the influencers to mimic the canned emotional attitudes.
Film Fan: What?
The Duck One: Then, if it is working, the mimicry continues into the mass group of the influenced. In a way, it's just an extension of the dream world of cinema slipping into the marketplace advertising world, that is, paid actors in a movie pretending to be people they aren't in a story that never happened being promoted by people who never saw it pretending to have an emotion about it.
Film Fan: Quack, quack, quack! You're a duck! I love the movie!
The Duck One: A movie is an inanimate object, it can't love you back. The movement and life in it is an illusion! It's a recording. I'm not saying don't go see the movie, I'm not saying don't adore the movie! I'm saying the marketing is trying to convince you to share in a pre-existing opinion instead of having your own opinion!
Film Fan: Quack, quack, quack!
The Duck One: Mock if you want, my friend, but the duck kingdom doesn't have this problem!
You will see Amazon links on this web site because I am an Amazon affiliate. I earn from qualifying purchases.
Original page July 28, 2021 | Updated July 22, 2023